 |
| Former State-Owned Enterprises Secretary, Muhammad Said Didu (Spesial) |
sukabumiNews.net, JAKARTA – Former State-Owned Enterprises Secretary, Muhammad Said Didu, revealed a budget package to save Indonesia from the brink of decline.
The Pinrang Regency native emphasized that the budget
package in question involves removing Jokowi's family from the national
political stage.
"A budget package to save the nation, put Jokowi
on trial and impeach Gibran," Said Didu said on Twitter @msaid_didu (July
9, 2025), as reported by Fajar.
Previously, constitutional law expert Zainal Arifin
Mochtar emphasized that constitutionally, the basis for impeaching Gibran has
actually been met.
He made this statement while speaking at a discussion
forum titled "Towards Gibran's Impeachment: Where Will the DPR Go?"
held by Formappi on Wednesday (June 18, 2025).
Zainal stated that there are three categories of
grounds for impeachment stipulated in the 1945 Constitution, specifically
Articles 7A and 7B: violations of criminal law, administrative violations, and
disgraceful acts.
"There are three grounds for impeachment based on
Article 7, specifically Articles 7A-7B of the 1945 Constitution: criminal
violations, administrative violations, and disgraceful acts," said Zainal.
According to him, the elements of legal violations can
be observed in Ubedilah Badrun's report, which alludes to Gibran's alleged
involvement in a corruption case.
As for administrative violations, he touched on the
legality of documents such as diplomas or the validity of other administrative
stages.
"Disgraceful acts? There are many. There's
Fufufafa, nepotism," he emphasized.
However, although legally the opportunity for
impeachment is open, Zainal acknowledged that the political path to it remains
difficult. One key factor, he said, is the solid coalition of parties
supporting the government in the House of Representatives.
"If Prabowo-Gibran supporters remain strongly
united, then the calculation won't reach the point of having the right to
express an opinion, if we look at it from a government coalition
perspective," he explained.
At the end of the discussion, Zainal also highlighted
the Constitutional Court (MK). He openly expressed his doubts about the
institution's neutrality.
"I'm sorry, but I can't consider the MK a legal
entity. I think the MK is a political entity," he concluded.
0Komentar